The suggested main areas for discussion is "Development vs Talent Identification"
Although it does act as a Talent Identification System for both Youth and Seniors, it also plays a role in allowing women and girls to play the full sided game and receive new coaching ideas to feed into their clubs. However, is there too much emphasis on Talent Identification and should the programme be all about development? Alternatively do you think the programme does not reflect the competitive needs of those aspiring to be England Players of the future?
Questions to consider:
Youth
- Selection: Should Trials be open or through County/Club nominations? Are the trials in their current format suitable?
- Developmental or Talent Identification? Is it possible to combine the two? How?
- Should all Youth Players selected for a Regional Squad have the right to equal playing time within the programme or should the emphasis be on allowing the more talented players time on the pitch?
- Should the ethos for the programme be about performing to the highest level or about having fun? Is it the same for both age groups?
- Should the Royal Sun Alliance Tournament be about winning or about ensuring that everybody gets at least 1 game?
Senior
- Selection - Trials and/or County/Club nomination? Should there be a guideline on which players would be suitable?
- Should the Senior Programme be development or Talent Identification orientated?
- Should players who have climbed the Pathway to England and are on their way down be eligible?
- Should Representative players (i.e. England U19s and England Students) be considered for the relevant age-groups? Should players selected for Super 4s and Super League but not selected for the England 44 be allowed to trial for Senior Regional?
- Should there be an age-limit for Senior Programme candidates e.g. U23s or U25s?
NB These questions are not exhaustive and are a guideline for your suggestions. If you wish to discuss one of the questions, clearly state which one in your feedback. If you wish to discuss elements of the programme not included so far please feel free to do so. RFUW greatly appreciate suggestions as well as constructive criticism.
Any suggestions and comments will be considered by the Review Group, and their findings will be presented to the RFUW Board once the consultation is completed. The Development & Performance Departments will then examine ways in which these findings can be implemented for the future running of the Programme.
RFUW are also interested in thoughts about the current format. As always funding is limited, but suggestions on how we can make the most of the funding available are also welcome.
Expressions of interest are also invited from those wishing to be considered to sit on the Regional Programme Review GroupThe Review Group is expected to meet no more than four times over the next season with the first meeting on Saturday August 12th. (other dates will be: Sat 7th Oct, Sunday 12th Nov, Sunday 1st April).
Comments to the review and expressions of interest should be forwarded to Claire Sanderson on clairesanderson@rfu.com. Please include “Regional Programme Review” in the subject line of all e-mails.
No comments:
Post a Comment